April 16, 2025
Greenwashing occurs when a business engages in inaccurate, deceptive, or excessively inflated assertions about its environmental credentials.
Greenwashing occurs when a business engages in inaccurate, deceptive, or excessively inflated assertions about its environmental credentials. These claims often revolve around the business's environmental or social metrics, involving manipulations such as lowering pollution or energy usage statistics to create a misleading impression of being more 'green,' 'sustainable,' or 'energy efficient.'
Companies may also falsely claim the use of environmentally friendly chemicals or provide misleading information about workers' conditions. Moreover, generic environmental claims using buzzwords like 'biodegradable', 'eco', or 'natural' without substantiation can contribute to greenwashing. When such claims, intended to attract stakeholders or consumers, prove untrue or exaggerated, the business is deemed guilty of greenwashing. This can be a deliberate marketing strategy or unintentional misinformation resulting from inaccurate reporting.
In essence, the answer is yes.
Whether confronted directly or indirectly by legislation, greenwashing fundamentally constitutes deceptive marketing and misrepresentation, an act deemed illegal in most countries. Numerous nations have established either general anti-false advertising legislation or specifically targeted greenwashing laws to address companies that potentially mislead stakeholders through unsubstantiated 'green' claims. The subsequent examples illustrate countries that have implemented either False Advertising legislation or measures against greenwashing. Here are some examples:
In China, The Advertising Law 2021 prevents advertisements from containing false or misleading claims when describing the product's quality, production ingredients, purpose, where it was made, etc. Punishments for violations of this law include significant fines.
In the UK, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) released The Green Claims Code with accompanying guidance on helping businesses understand greenwashing and ultimately warns companies about the UK consumer protection laws that prevent misleading marketing regulations. In addition to guidance, the UK legislation includes the Business Protection from Misleading Marketing Regulations 2008, which has considerable punitive measures for false advertising, including fines and imprisonment.
In Canada, there are several pieces of legislation against greenwashing, including the Competition Act, Textile Labelling Act, and Consumer Packaging and Labelling Act, which addresses companies making incorrect or misleading representations. It contains a guide of greenwashing laws and the repercussions for making unsubstantiated claims.
In Singapore, there are a number of false advertising and consumer protection laws and guidelines related to greenwashing, including the Misrepresentation Act, the Singapore Code of Advertising, and The Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act (CPFTA).
In France, there are several different laws and guidelines that prevent greenwashing. These include the Anti-Greenwashing Guide and the Consumer Code, which prevent misleading advertising. The Climate and Resilience Act directly regulates advertisements relating to greenwashing, fossil fuels, and specific products such as cars with set levels of carbon dioxide emissions. Violation can result in two years imprisonment, fines proportionate to the value of benefits deriving from the advertisement, and information being communicated to the public to tarnish the company's reputation.
Additionally, recently in the EU, Members of the European Parliament voted 467-65 in favor of passing a set of regulations focused on safeguarding consumers against greenwashing. These regulations include a mandate for companies to undergo verification of product marketing claims, such as "less polluting," before they are permitted to use them.
Having established that greenwashing involves businesses making untrue statements about their environmental metrics, it's imperative to recognize its illegality and stringent regulations.
To avoid greenwashing, businesses must exercise precision and accuracy in advertising and claims concerning environmental impact. It is crucial to steer clear of vague, incorrect, or misleading terminology, such as 'natural,' 'green,' 'eco-conscious,' and 'sustainable. ' While these buzzwords possess meaning, they need more specificity and clarity, leading to potential misinterpretations. To mitigate this risk, businesses should strive for specificity in their claims, providing a clear understanding of the practices and outcomes they represent.
Additionally, businesses should exercise caution when using colours and imagery in marketing materials. Overuse of green or depictions of nature can inadvertently convey environmental benefits and sustainability, potentially misleading stakeholders.
Ensuring accuracy and transparency in disclosing environmental metrics, such as pollution, water and energy usage, and waste disposal, is paramount. Selective sharing of favourable data that paints the business positively while omitting less favourable information is misleading. Businesses should refrain from manipulating data to present a more favourable image.
Lastly, businesses should refrain from utilizing labels that mimic third-party endorsements unless they have genuinely earned them. Misleading stakeholders through applying a sustainability label constitutes greenwashing and must be avoided at all costs.